Criteria for Inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric
    Page information
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.criteria.inclusion
    Date16 August 2026

    Introduction

    The purpose of the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric is to provide a stable, operational framework for the identification and analysis of Arabic rhetorical devices. The encyclopedia's scope is not to catalogue every named phenomenon in the Arabic rhetorical tradition. Accordingly, the encyclopedia's inclusion criteria ensure that each device contributes meaningfully to:

    • Clear rhetorical identification,
    • Structural analysis,
    • Consistent annotation, and
    • Computational or corpus-based operationalisation.

    A rhetorical device is included only if it satisfies methodological standards that ensure analytical clarity, structural distinctiveness, and reliable identification. The full inventory of the encyclopedia's rhetorical devices can be accessed from the home page, and in derived resources such as the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy, the Arabic Rhetorical Device Identifier, and the Balagha-ID app.

    Devices that lack the necessary definitional precision, overlap extensively with broader interpretive phenomena, or cannot be annotated with reasonable reliability are not included. Exclusion does not deny a rhetorical device's historical attestation or rhetorical value. Rather, it reflects a principled commitment to taxonomic coherence and operational clarity. The Encyclopedia maintains a list of devices which have been rejected, along with the reasoning for rejection.

    Criteria for Inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    The Criteria for Inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric are derived from the encyclopedia's theoretical framework which is outlined in the Design Principles of the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric. A candidate rhetorical device must satisfy all of the following criteria for inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric:

    CATEGORY A: CLASSICAL PROVENANCE

    Criterion 1: Attestation

    CATEGORY B: RHETORICAL ACTION

    Criterion 2: Linguistic operation

    Criterion 3: Cognitive relationship

    • A candidate rhetorical device must establish or activate an identifiable cognitive relationship between communicator and addressee through which the device functions rhetorically.

    Criterion 4: Pragmatic (i.e. rhetorical) effect

    • A candidate rhetorical device, operating through that cognitive relationship, must be capable of producing an identifiable pragmatic effect in the addressee.
    • The effect need not correspond to demonstrable authorial intent, and a particular occurrence need not demonstrably produce the effect in every addressee.
    CATEGORY C: AMENABLE TO OPERATIONALISATION

    Criterion 5: Taxonomic distinctiveness

    • A candidate rhetorical device must be sufficiently distinct from existing devices in its linguistic operation, or in the combination of linguistic operation and cognitive relationship through which it functions, to justify an independent taxonomic position.

    Criterion 6: Operationally identifiable

    • Established Arabic rhetorical theory must attest to the candidate rhetorical device with sufficient definitional clarity and exemplification to permit stable operationalisation, such that independent analysts can identify and annotate the candidate rhetorical device using defined criteria derived from this attestation.

    See Also

    Page History