ANTITH: Antithesis

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    الطباق
    ANTITH: Antithesis
    CategoryLinguistic Embellishments
    (‘ilm al-badī‘)
    SubcategoryContrasts & Inversions
    Synonymsالمطابقة
    تضادّ
      
    Balagha-Corpus.com
    Corpus dataSee examples
      
    Balaghascore.com
    CodeCC-1
      
    OpenAlex
    IDW4415372292
      
    BalaghaBase.org
    CodeQ69
      
    Cite this page
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.Q69
     Download PDF
      
    Taxonomy
    ARDTv0.1.0, v0.1.1

    Definition

    Antithesis (al-ṭibāq) is an Arabic rhetorical device involving the juxtaposition of two words whose meanings are mutually opposed — that is, whose meanings cannot coexist simultaneously in the same thing — whether the opposition is literal or figurative. The two words may be nouns, verbs, or particles, and the opposition may be allegorical or non-allegorical.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

    Mechanism

    Antithesis operates through the juxtaposition of lexical items with opposite meanings within the same proposition or across closely related propositions.[1][6]

    The opposition can be achieved through:

    • Direct antonyms — two words with inherently opposite meanings.[3][6]
    • Negated forms — a word and its negation, such as lā takhshū and ikhshawn.[1]

    The opposing terms may appear in different grammatical forms:

    • Nouns — such as al-ẓulumāt and al-nūr.[3]
    • Verbs — such as aḍḥaka and abkā.[3]
    • Particles — such as lahā and ʿalayhā.[1]
    • Mixed grammatical categories — such as a noun paired with a verb.[3][7]

    Recognition

    The following diagnostic tests aid identification. These criteria are not explicitly presented by the sources as a recognition checklist, but are derived from the source-attested mechanism of the device.

    Antithesis may be present when:

    • Two words with opposite meanings appear in the same sentence or in closely related sentences.[1][6]
    • One term appears in positive form and a related term appears in negated form, producing semantic contrast.[1]
    • Two terms appear to be opposites but the opposition only becomes apparent once the figurative meaning of one or both terms is understood — this may indicate either true antithesis or simulated antithesis (إيهام التضاد).[7][6]

    Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects

    • Aesthetic enhancement — the juxtaposition of opposing meanings adds beauty and freshness to expression.[3]
    • Meaning enrichment (تكميل المعنى) — the opposition strengthens and completes the meaning when it serves the rhetorical purpose of the utterance.[6]

    Applying the Recognition Framework

    The information on this page can be used to evaluate whether this device is present in a candidate lexical item using the Specific Device Recognition part of the Universal Framework for Identifying Arabic Rhetorical Devices:

    • Use the Definition, Mechanism, and Recognition sections of this page in Step 1.
    • Apply the substitution test in Step 2.
    • Consider contextual indicators in Step 3.
    • Use the Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects section of this page in Step 4.

    Types of Antithesis

    Type 1: Non-Negated Antithesis (طباق الإيجاب)

    Definition
    The occurrence of two antonyms in a given proposition without negation.[1][3]
    Source Example

    وَمَا يَسْتَوِى ٱلْأَعْمَىٰ وَٱلْبَصِيرُ
    وَلَا ٱلظُّلُمَـٰتُ وَلَا ٱلنُّورُ

    Quran 35:19-20
    Not equal are the blind and the seeing; nor are the darkness and the light.

    Explanation
    The non-negated antithesis is represented by the antonyms (الأعمى / البصير) and (الظلمات / النور).
    Source Example

    وَتَحْسَبُهُمْ أَيْقَاظًا وَهُمْ رُقُودٌ

    Quran 18:18
    You would think them awake, whereas they are asleep.

    Explanation
    The non-negated antithesis is represented by the antonyms ayqāẓan (awake) and ruqūd (asleep).[8]

    Oxymoron

    Definition
    In English rhetorical terminology, an oxymoron is a specialised case of non-negated antithesis (طباق الإيجاب) in which the two opposing terms are mutually exclusive and are applied simultaneously to a single referent, producing a paradoxical expression. Abdul-Raof (2006) labels this device "oxymoron" and provides examples of it,[9] but does not supply a classical Arabic term, and the device has no independent standing in the classical balagha tradition. It is therefore not treated as a separate entry in this encyclopedia.
    Source Example

    سيجعلُ اللهُ بعد عُسْرٍ يُسْرا

    God will grant ease, following hardship (Q65:7).

    Explanation
    The antonyms ʿusr (hardship) and yusr (ease) are placed in direct proximity.[9]
    Source Example

    جلسَ الأشقّاءُ الأعداءُ على طاولة المُفاوضات

    The enemy brothers sat down on the negotiating table.

    Explanation
    The antonyms al-ashqāʾ (brothers) and al-aʿdāʾ (enemies) are mutually exclusive categories applied simultaneously to the same group.[9]
    Constructed Example

    نعيش في قرية عالمية.

    We live in a global village.

    Explanation
    The terms ʿālamiyya (global) and qarya (village) are mutually exclusive in scale yet applied to the same referent simultaneously.
    Constructed Example

    يَبْدَأُ الطِّفْلُ حَيَاتَهُ ضَعِيفًا وَيَنْتَهِي شَيْخًا ضَعِيفًا، غَيْرَ أَنَّهُ يَمُرُّ بَيْنَهُمَا قَوِيًّا.

    A person begins life weak and ends it weak, yet passes between the two strong.

    Explanation
    The non-negated antithesis is represented by the antonyms ḍaʿīfan (weak) and qawiyyan (strong).

    Type 2: Negated Antithesis (طباق السلب)

    Definition
    Opposition achieved through negation, where one of the two opposites appears in negated form, producing semantic contrast.[1][3]
    Source Example

    فَلَا تَخْشَوُا النَّاسَ وَاخْشَوْنِ

    Quran 5:44
    Do not fear the people, but fear Me.

    Explanation
    The negated antithesis is achieved through the opposition between negated and affirmative forms of the same semantic field.
    Source Example

    وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ يَعْلَمُونَ ظَهْرًا مِنَ الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا

    Quran 30:6–7
    But most people do not know. They know an outward appearance of the worldly life.

    Explanation
    The negated antithesis is achieved through the opposition between lā yaʿlamūna (they do not know) and yaʿlamūna (they know) — negated and affirmative forms of the same verb.[8]

    Note: Simulated Antithesis (إيهام التضاد)

    Definition
    A figure in which two terms appear to be opposites, but the opposition depends on metaphorical or contextual usage rather than straightforward lexical opposition. Al-Qazwīnī names this إيهام التضاد.[2][6][10] It is therefore not a subtype of antithesis but a borderline case that fails to meet the criterion of genuine semantic opposition.[2][10]
    Source Example

    لا تَعجَبي يا سَلمى مِن رَجُلٍ ضَحِكَ المَشيبُ بِرَأسِهِ فَبَكى

    Dīʿbil
    Do not be surprised, O Salmā, at a man on whose head hoariness is laughing, but he is weeping.

    Explanation
    The apparent opposition is between ḍaḥika (laughing) and bakā (weeping), but the first term is metaphorical.
    Constructed Example

    لا تَيْأَسْ مِنَ الغَدِ، بَلِ ارْجُهُ.

    Do not despair of tomorrow; rather, hope for it.

    Explanation
    The negated antithesis is achieved through the opposition between the negated lā tayʾas (do not despair) and the affirmative irjuhu (hope for it), two verbs from the same semantic field of orientation toward the future.

    Different From

    • المقابلة (Parallel Antithesis) — الطباق joins a single pair of opposites, whereas المقابلة extends this to two or more ordered pairs of corresponding opposites.[11][12][7]

    Compound Devices

    Parallel Antithesis (al-muqābala)

    Definition
    In classical Arabic rhetoric, المقابلة is an independent rhetorical device in which two or more meanings are followed by their corresponding opposites in the same order.[11][12][7][13][8] The Encyclopedia analyses this as a compound configuration of Antithesis and Parallelism.
    Subtypes
    Classical sources identify subtypes by the number of paired terms.[12][7]
    • Two against two (مقابلة اثنين باثنين) — two meanings followed by their two opposites in order
    • Three against three (مقابلة ثلاثة بثلاثة) — three meanings followed by their three opposites in order
    • Four against four (مقابلة أربعة بأربعة) — four meanings followed by their four opposites in order
    Validity condition
    المقابلة is faulty (فاسدة) if the ordered correspondence is violated.[11][12]
    Source Example

    يُحِلُّ لَهُمُ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَيُحَرِّمُ عَلَيْهِمُ الْخَبَائِثَ

    Quran 7:157
    He makes lawful for them the good things and forbids them the evil things.

    Explanation
    This passage exhibits three ordered oppositions: yuḥillu / yuḥarrimu, lahum / ʿalayhim, and al-ṭayyibāt / al-khabāʾith. It is therefore an example of مقابلة ثلاثة بثلاثة — three against three.[14][13]
    Source Example

    فَلْيَضْحَكُوا قَلِيلًا وَلْيَبْكُوا كَثِيرًا

    Quran 9:82
    Let them laugh a little and weep much.

    Explanation
    This passage exhibits two ordered oppositions: falyadḥakū (let them laugh) / walyabkū (let them weep), and qalīlan (a little) / kathīran (much). It is therefore an example of مقابلة اثنين باثنين — two against two.[8]
    Source Example

    فَأَمَّا مَن أَعْطَىٰ وَاتَّقَىٰ وَصَدَّقَ بِالْحُسْنَىٰ فَسَنُيَسِّرُهُ لِلْيُسْرَىٰ وَأَمَّا مَن بَخِلَ وَاسْتَغْنَىٰ وَكَذَّبَ بِالْحُسْنَىٰ فَسَنُيَسِّرُهُ لِلْعُسْرَىٰ

    Quran 92:5–10
    As for he who gives and fears God and believes in the best reward, We will ease him toward ease. But as for he who withholds and considers himself free of need and denies the best reward, We will ease him toward difficulty.

    Explanation
    This passage exhibits four ordered oppositions: aʿṭā / bakhila, ittaqā / istaghna, ṣaddaqa / kadhdhaba, and al-yusrā / al-ʿusrā. It is therefore an example of المقابلة rather than simple الطباق.[1][7][13]
    Constructed Example

    يَنْتَعِشُ الأَمَلُ في القُلُوبِ الحَيَّةِ، وَيَمُوتُ اليَأْسُ في القُلُوبِ المَيِّتَةِ.

    Hope flourishes in living hearts, and despair dies in dead hearts.

    Explanation
    This passage exhibits two ordered oppositions: yantaʿishu (flourishes) / yamūtu (dies), and al-amalu (hope) / al-yāʾsu (despair), with the further reinforcing opposition of al-ḥayya (living) / al-mayyita (dead). It is therefore an example of مقابلة اثنين باثنين — two against two.

    Similar to

    References

    1. a b c d e f g h i Hussein Abdul-Raof, Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis (Oxford: Routledge, 2006), 245-246, ISBN 9780415386098. DOI: 10.4324/9780203965399
    2. a b c W. P. Heinrichs, ‘Rhetorical Figures’, in Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, ed. Julie Scott Meisami and Paul Starkey (London: Routledge, 1998), 659, ISBN 0415068088. DOI: 10.4324/9780203020425
    3. a b c d e f g h Aḥmad al-Hāshimī, Jawāhir al-Balāgha fī al-Maʿānī wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Badīʿ (Windsor: Hindāwī Foundation, 2019), 365–366, ISBN 9781527316386.
    4. Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 596-598.
    5. Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 476-477.
    6. a b c d e f g ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Atīq, ʿIlm al-Badīʿ (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya lil-Ṭibāʿa wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2002), 76-84.
    7. a b c d e f g Faḍl Ḥasan ʿAbbās, Al-Balāgha: Funūnuhā wa-Afnānuhā - ʿIlm al-Bayān wa-al-Badīʿ (Amman: Dār al-Furqān lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2007), 279-284.
    8. a b c d e Ḥafnī Nāṣif, Muḥammad Diyāb, Sultan Muḥammad and Muṣṭafā Ṭammām, Durūs al-Balāgha (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2012), 107, ISBN 9786144162798.
    9. a b c Hussein Abdul-Raof, Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis (Oxford: Routledge, 2006), 254, ISBN 9780415386098. DOI: 10.4324/9780203965399
    10. a b Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 252-253.
    11. a b c Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 655-656.
    12. a b c d ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Atīq, ʿIlm al-Badīʿ (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya lil-Ṭibāʿa wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2002), 84-91.
    13. a b c Aḥmad al-Hāshimī, Jawāhir al-Balāgha fī al-Maʿānī wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Badīʿ (Windsor: Hindāwī Foundation, 2019), 366, ISBN 9781527316386.
    14. Hussein Abdul-Raof, Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis (Oxford: Routledge, 2006), 252-253, ISBN 9780415386098. DOI: 10.4324/9780203965399



    Page history

    You are viewing the live version of this page. Would you like to view the version included in the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy (v0.1.1)?