GRPDIV: Grouping Then Dividing

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    الجمع مع التقسيم
    GRPDIV: Grouping Then Dividing
    CategoryLinguistic Embellishments
    (‘ilm al-badī‘)
    SubcategoryGrouping & Distinguishing
      
    Balaghascore.com
    CodeCB-3
      
    BalaghaBase.org
    CodeQ85
      
    OpenAlex.org
    IDW4415372678
      
    Cite this page
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.Q85
     Download PDF
      
    Taxonomy
    ARDTv0.1.0, v0.1.1

    Definition

    Grouping Then Dividing (al-jamʿ maʿa al-taqsīm) is an Arabic rhetorical device where two or more entities are first brought together under a shared governing judgement (jam'), and then the gathered elements are divided (taqsīm), or conversely, the divisions appear first and are later unified under a shared governing judgement.[1][2][3][4]

    Mechanism

    The device operates through two possible patterns:

    • Gather then divide: The speaker begins with a comprehensive statement covering multiple cases or entities under one ruling, then elaborates by returning to each entity separately and assigning it what belongs to it.[1][2][3][4]
    • Divide then gather: The speaker first presents distinct divisions with their specific properties, then unifies them under a single collective ruling.[1][2][3][4]

    Recognition

    Grouping Then Dividing may be present when:

    • Multiple entities are first brought under one shared ruling, then redistributed into distinct outcomes.
    • Or multiple distinct outcomes are first stated, then unified under one collective ruling.
    • The device may operate in either direction: gathering then dividing, or dividing then gathering.

    Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects

    The first subtype — gather then divide — is considered more beautiful and more effective on hearts than the second, and it is the form predominantly used by the composers of badīʿiyyāt poetry.[3][4]

    Applying the Recognition Framework

    The information on this page can be used to evaluate whether this device is present in a candidate lexical item using the Specific Device Recognition part of the Universal Framework for Identifying Arabic Rhetorical Devices:

    • Use the Definition, Mechanism, and Recognition sections of this page in Step 1.
    • Apply the substitution test in Step 2.
    • Consider contextual indicators in Step 3.
    • Use the Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects section of this page in Step 4.

    Types of Grouping Then Dividing

    Type 1: Gather then divide

    The speaker first gathers multiple entities under a single governing ruling, then divides that ruling by assigning each entity what belongs to it.

    Source Example

    ٱللَّهُ يَتَوَفَّى ٱلْأَنفُسَ حِينَ مَوْتِهَا وَٱلَّتِى لَمْ تَمُتْ فِى مَنَامِهَا فَيُمْسِكُ ٱلَّتِى قَضَىٰ عَلَيْهَا ٱلْمَوْتَ وَيُرْسِلُ ٱلْأُخْرَىٰٓ إِلَىٰٓ أَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى

    God takes souls at the time of their death, and those that did not die [He takes] during their sleep; then He retains those for whom He has decreed death, and releases the others until a specified term.
    Qur'an 39:42

    Explanation
    The verse first presents the general act of God taking souls, then divides that act into two distinct categories: those taken at death and those taken during sleep. The collective act is thus distinguished between the two categories.
    Source Example

    حتى أقام على أرباض خرشنة      تشقى به الروم والصلبان والبيع
    للرق ما نسلوا والقتل ما ولدوا      والنهب ما جمعوا والنار ما زرعوا

    [Sayf al-Dawla led the armies] until he had control of the suburbs of Kharshana, the Byzantines and their crosses and churches made utterly miserable through him: destined for captivity was what they had married, for massacring what they had given birth to, for plundering what they had gathered, for the fire what they had sown.

    al-Mutanabbī

    Explanation
    The first verse gathers the Byzantines, their crosses, and their churches under the single ruling of misery. The second verse then divides that ruling, returning to each group — wives, children, wealth, crops — the fate that belongs to it: captivity, slaughter, plunder, and burning.[2][3][4]
    Source Example

    سأطلب حقي بالقنا ومشايخ      كأنهم من طول ما الثموا مردُ

    I shall seek my right by the spear and by elders who, from the length of their silence, seem beardless.

    Explanation
    The speaker gathers two instruments of seeking his right — the spear and the elders — under one governing act, then specifies each through what distinguishes it.[2]
    Source Example

    ثقال إذا لاقوا خفاف إذا دعوا      كثير إذا شدوا قليل إذ عُدوا

    Heavy when they meet [the enemy], light when called, many when they charge, few when counted.

    Explanation
    Multiple qualities are gathered under one subject, then each is divided and assigned to its specific circumstance.[2]
    Source Example

    أبادهم فلبيت المال ما جمعوا      والروح للسيف والأجساد للرخم

    He destroyed them: to the treasury went what they had gathered, to the sword their souls, and to the vultures their bodies.

    Ṣafī al-Dīn al-Ḥillī

    Explanation
    The poet gathers the rebels under the single ruling of destruction, then divides that ruling by assigning their wealth to the treasury, their souls to the sword, and their bodies to the vultures.[3][4]
    Constructed Example

    عانى الطلاب جميعاً في الامتحان: فأخطأ أصحاب الرياضيات في حساباتهم، ونسي أصحاب التاريخ تواريخهم، وخلط أصحاب اللغة في قواعدهم

    The students all struggled in the examination: the mathematicians failed their calculations, the historians forgot their dates, and the linguists confused their grammar.

    Explanation
    The students are first gathered under the single ruling of struggling, then each group is divided and assigned its specific failure.

    Type 2: Divide then gather

    The speaker first presents the divisions, assigning distinct properties to distinct subjects, then unifies them under a single collective ruling.

    Source Example

    قوم إذا حاربوا ضروا عدوهم      أو حاولوا النفع في أشياعهم نفعوا
    سجية تلك منهم غير محدثة      إن الخلائق فاعلم شرها البدع

    A people who, when they fight, harm their enemy, and when they seek benefit for their followers, they benefit them — that is a character innate to them, not newly acquired; know that the worst of traits are innovations.

    Ḥassān ibn Thābit

    Explanation
    The first verse divides the tribe's qualities into two distinct properties — harm to the enemy in war, and benefit to allies in peace — and then gathers both under the single collective ruling in the second verse: that this is their innate character, not a novelty.[2][3][4]
    Constructed Example

    قاتل الجندي بشجاعة في ميدان المعركة، وكدّ العالم بلا كلل في مكتبه، وكدح الفلاح من الفجر إلى الغسق في حقله — كلهم خدام وطنهم

    The soldier fought bravely on the battlefield, the scholar laboured tirelessly in his study, and the farmer toiled from dawn to dusk in his fields — all of them servants of their nation.

    Explanation
    The three figures are first divided with their distinct roles, then gathered under the single ruling of service to the nation.

    See Also

    Notes

    • The device was placed by al-Sakkākī among the المحسنات المعنوية (meaning-based embellishments). Its definition was attested without material variation by Ibn Mālik in al-Miṣbāḥ, al-Ḥalabī in Ḥusn al-Tawassul, al-Nuwayrī in Nihāyat al-Arab, al-Qazwīnī in al-Talkhīṣ, Ibn Ḥijja al-Ḥamawī in Khizānat al-Adab, al-Suyūṭī in al-Itqān, Ibn Maʿṣūm al-Madanī in Anwār al-Rabīʿ, and Jurjānūs Farḥāt in Bulūgh al-Arab.[4]

    References

    1. a b c W. P. Heinrichs, ‘Rhetorical Figures’, in Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, ed. Julie Scott Meisami and Paul Starkey (London: Routledge, 1998), 658, ISBN 0415068088. DOI: 10.4324/9780203020425
    2. a b c d e f g Aḥmad al-Hāshimī, Jawāhir al-Balāgha fī al-Maʿānī wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Badīʿ (Windsor: Hindāwī Foundation, 2019), 376, ISBN 9781527316386.
    3. a b c d e f g Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 464.
    4. a b c d e f g h ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Atīq, ʿIlm al-Badīʿ (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya lil-Ṭibāʿa wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2002), 158-160.



    Page history

    You are viewing the live version of this page. Would you like to view the version included in the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy (v0.1.1)?