METRICL: Metrical Ellipsis

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    التشريع
    METRICL: Metrical Ellipsis
    CategoryLinguistic Embellishments
    (‘ilm al-badī‘)
    SubcategoryRhythmic Structuring & Balance
      
    Balaghascore.com
    CodeCD-5
      
    BalaghaBase.org
    CodeQ131
      
    OpenAlex.org
    IDW4415412448
      
    Cite this page
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.Q131
     Download PDF
      
    Taxonomy
    ARDTv0.1.0, v0.1.1

    Definition

    Metrical Ellipsis (al-tashrīʿ) is an Arabic rhetorical device in which a poetic verse (bayt) is constructed on two rhymes such that stopping at either rhyme yields valid and meaningful poetry, and if part of it is omitted the remainder remains metrically valid verse.[1][2]

    Mechanism

    • The verse is constructed on two rhymes (qāfiyatān).[1]
    • The meaning remains valid when stopping at either of the two rhymes.[2]
    • If part of the verse is omitted, the remaining portion remains metrically correct and meaningful poetry.[2]
    • The two portions may operate on two different metres or on one metre, provided the meaning remains orderly and valid in both readings.[2]

    In this encyclopedia, the mechanism is described as follows:

    • An earlier rhyme-position and the final rhyme-position each form independently valid stopping points, so that both the shortened and complete forms function as verse.

    Recognition

    Metrical Ellipsis may be present when:

    • The verse contains an earlier stopping-point and a final rhyme-end, and both the shortened and complete forms produce valid meaning and metrically correct verse.[2][3]

    The following diagnostic test aids identification:

    • Remove the latter portion of the verse from the earlier rhyme onward. If the remaining portion forms metrically correct and meaningful poetry, the device may be present.

    Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects

    • The device creates a sense of poetic surplus: the verse reaches formal and semantic completion at an earlier rhyme-point, yet continues into a second complete closure, producing an impression of addition beyond necessity.
    • The dual completeness creates a sense of structural fullness or double resolution, as both the earlier and final stopping-points satisfy the formal expectations of verse.
    • Where the second portion extends or develops the first, the device may produce a movement from compression to elaboration, allowing the verse to unfold additional meaning after an already complete initial closure.
    • The device can create an impression of virtuosity and controlled excess, since the poet demonstrably could have stopped at the earlier rhyme yet continues into a second complete closure without breaking metre or meaning.

    Applying the Recognition Framework

    The information on this page can be used to evaluate whether this device is present in a candidate lexical item using the Specific Device Recognition part of the Universal Framework for Identifying Arabic Rhetorical Devices:

    • Use the Definition, Mechanism, and Recognition sections of this page in Step 1.
    • Apply the substitution test in Step 2.
    • Consider contextual indicators in Step 3.
    • Use the Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects section of this page in Step 4.

    Examples

    Source Example

    يَا خَاطِبَ الدُّنْيَا الدَّنِيَّةَ إِنَّهَا ۝ شَرَكُ الرَّدَى وَقَرَارَةُ الأَكْدَارِ

    O suitor of this base world — it is the snare of destruction and the vessel of all murk.

    Explanation
    This verse, cited by al-Qazwīnī (as cited in Akkawi),[2] permits stopping at innahā as one valid poetic unit, while the full line ending at al-akdār forms another complete poetic unit. This demonstrates that the verse has been deliberately structured for dual poetic completeness.
    Source Example

    يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلِكُ الَّذِي عَمَّ الْوَرَى ۝ مَا فِي الْكِرَامِ لَهُ نَظِيرٌ يُنظَرُ
    لَوْ كَانَ مِثْلَكَ آخَرٌ فِي عَصْرِنَا ۝ مَا كَانَ فِي الدُّنْيَا فَقِيرٌ مُعْسِرُ

    O king who has encompassed all of mankind — among the noble there is none whose like can be found. Were there another like you in our age, there would be no poor or destitute in the world.

    Explanation
    Stopping at the earlier rhyme yields a valid poetic unit, while continuing to the final rhyme yields a fuller complete poetic unit. This demonstrates that the verse has been deliberately structured for dual poetic completeness.[1]
    Source Example

    وَإِذَا الرِّيَاحُ مَعَ الْعَشِيِّ تَنَاوَحَتْ ۝ هَصُوجُ الرِّمْصَالِ بِكَثِيبِهِنَّ شَمَالَا
    الْفِيتَنَّا نَقْرِي الْعَبِيطَ لِضَيْفِنَا ۝ قَبْلَ الْقِتَالِ وَنَقْتُلُ الْأَبْطَالَا

    When the winds at evening clash together — the north wind driving the sand-heaps — we serve fresh slaughtered meat to our guest before battle, and slay the heroes.

    Explanation
    Stopping at the earlier rhyme yields a valid poetic unit, while continuing to the final rhyme yields a fuller complete poetic unit. This demonstrates that the verse has been deliberately structured for dual poetic completeness. The verse is anonymous and pre-Islamic, cited by Atīq (2002).[3]
    Source Example

    يَرْنُو بِطَرْفٍ فَاتِرٍ مَهِيرَا ۝ فَهْوَ الْمُنَى لَا أَنْتَهِي عَنْ حُبِّهِ
    يَهْفُو بِغُصْنٍ نَاضِرٍ حُلْوِ الْجَنَى ۝ يَشْفِي الضَّنَى لَا صَبْرَ لِي عَنْ قُرْبِهِ
    لَوْ كَانَ يَوْماً زَائِرِي زَالَ الْعَنَا ۝ يَحْلُو لَنَا فِي الْحُبِّ أَنْ نُسَمَّى بِهِ

    He gazes with a languid eye — he is the wish I shall not cease to love. He sways like a fresh bough with sweet fruit — he heals the wasting, and I have no patience to be parted from him. Were he to visit me one day, all hardship would cease — it is sweet for us to be named by love.

    Explanation
    Verses by Muḥammad b. Jābir al-Andalusī al-Ḍarīr, cited by Atīq (2002)[3] Stopping at the earlier rhyme of each verse yields a valid poetic unit, while the full line ending at the later rhyme yields a second complete poetic unit. This demonstrates the dual-rhyme structure of the device across each verse.
    Constructed Example

    يَا أَيُّهَا الشَّاعِرُ الَّذِي أَحْيَا الْهُدَى ۝ فِي كُلِّ قَلْبٍ نُورُهُ لَا يَنْكَسِرْ
    لَوْ كَانَ فِي الدُّنْيَا سِوَاكَ مُجِيدُهَا ۝ مَا ضَاعَ مَعْنًى فِي الْكَلَامِ وَلَا انْدَثَرْ

    O poet who revived guidance — in every heart his light shall not be broken. Were there another master of it in the world, no meaning in speech would be lost or perish.

    Explanation
    Stopping at the earlier rhyme produces a meaningful poetic unit, while the full line produces a second complete unit. This illustrates the dual-rhyme architecture of the device.

    Notes

    • Metrical Ellipsis is also known in the classical tradition by the alternative names al-tawshīḥ, dhā al-qāfiyatayn, and al-tawām.[2]
    • Ḥamza al-ʿAlawī explains the naming of the device by saying that it causes the soul to hasten toward the completion of the rhyme; this is better understood as an explanation of its naming than as a rhetorical effect proper.[2]
    • What is added beyond the first rhyme is for the verse like an ornamental sash (al-wushāḥ), which is the origin of the alternative name al-tawshīḥ.[3]
    • The device belongs to poetic craft (al-ṣināʿa) rather than to eloquence (al-balāgha) and mastery (al-barāʿa), being marked by excess and contrivance (zāʾid wa-taʿassuf); it does not improve unless it comes sparingly (yasīran), like embroidery on a garment.[2][3] When a poet overuses the device in a single qaṣīda, it becomes a type of cold, lifeless craft (al-ṣināʿa al-bārida al-ghaththa); what is best in it comes only sparingly and effortlessly (ʿafwa al-khāṭir).[3]
    • Metrical Ellipsis is hardly ever used in rhymed prose (al-kalām al-manthūr al-masjūʿ) and is considered less effective there than in poetry.[3]
    • Nāṣif et al. specify shiʿran mufīdan (“meaningful poetry”), while Akkawi makes the metrical requirement explicit. Both formulations have been incorporated into the definition.

    References

    1. a b c Nāṣif, Ḥ., Diyāb, M., Muḥammad, S., & Ṭammām, M. (2012). Durūs al-Balāgha. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, pp. 120–121. ISBN 9786144162798.
    2. a b c d e f g h i Inʿām Fawwāl ʿAkkāwī, Al-Muʿjam al-Mufaṣṣal fī ʿUlūm al-Balāgha: Al-Badīʿ wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Maʿānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996), 357-358.
    3. a b c d e f g ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Atīq, ʿIlm al-Badīʿ (Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya lil-Ṭibāʿa wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2002), 241-245.



    Page history

    You are viewing the live version of this page. Would you like to view the version included in the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy (v0.1.1)?