AFFIRM: Affirmation

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    التأكيد
    AFFIRM: Affirmation
    CategorySentence Construction & Syntactical Stylistics
    (‘ilm al-ma‘ānī)
    SubcategorySentence-Type Switches
      
    Balaghascore.com
    CodeA-2
      
    BalaghaBase.org
    CodeQ42
      
    OpenAlex
    IDW4415329527
      
    Cite this page
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.Q42
     Download PDF
      
    Taxonomy
    ARDTv0.1.0, v0.1.1

    Definition

    Affirmation of the communicator’s proposition which is being conveyed in a reporting sentence takes place through the use of certain affirmatory constructions such as:

    • The particle ʾinna starting a nominal sentence.
    • The particles la-, ʾin, ʾan, , , and min, and the prefix bi-.
    • The construction ʾammā ... fa-.
    • The future-tense prefix sa- and the future-tense particle sawfa.
    • The use of qad before a past-tense verb.
    • Explicit pronouns.
    • Oaths using letters such as wa-, bi- or ta- prefixed to another oath word such as “Allah”.[1]
    • Light affirmation with the suffix -n and heavy affirmation with the suffix -nna.
    • Repetition of a negation.
    • The particle ʾinnamā.
    • Affirmative words such as ḥattā.
    • Use of the negation followed by an exception.

    Depending on the status of the addressee, reporting sentences may utilise 3 levels of affirmation:

    1. No affirmation: The addressee is open-minded or neutral about the communicator’s proposition: there is no requirement for affirmation.

      سليم: أنا مريض.

      Salim: I am ill.

    2. Light affirmation: The addressee is doubtful or sceptical about the communicator’s proposition, and there is a requirement for affirmation by using one affirmatory device.

      سليم: إنَّني مريض.

      Salim: Verily I am ill.

    3. Heavy affirmation: The addressee is in denial about the communicator’s proposition: there is a requirement for more intense affirmation by using two or more affirmatory devices.

      سليم: إنَّني لمريض.

      Salim: Verily I am truly ill.

    For rhetorical purposes, the affirmative may be used in a way outside this scheme of escalation.[2][3][4]

    Examples

    1) An open-minded or neutral addressee is addressed as if they are doubtful, with one affirmatory device

    كريم: أنت جاهز للسفر؟

    سليم: لا أريد أن أسافر اليوم. إنَّني مريض.


    Karim: Are you ready to travel?

    Salim: I do not want to travel today. Verily, I am ill.

    2) An open-minded or neutral addressee is addresses as if they were in denial, with two or more affirmatory devices

    كريم: أنت جاهز للسفر؟

    سليم: لا أريد أن أسافر اليوم. إنَّني لمريض فلن أخرج من بيتي إلا عند الضرورة.


    Karim: Are you ready to travel?

    Salim: I do not want to travel today. Verily I am truly ill, and so I will not leave my house unless it was necessary.

    3) An addressee in denial is addressed as if they were open-minded or neutral, without any affirmatory devices

    كريم: كلنا جاهزون للسفر والسيارة جاهزة أيضاً. أين أنت؟ ننتظر إليك...

    سليم: نصحني الطبيب بالبقاء بالبيت اليوم.


    Karim: We are all ready to travel, and the car is ready too. Where are you? We are waiting for you.

    Salim: The doctor advised me to stay home today.

    References

    1. Ayman Amin Abd Al-Ghani, Al-Kāfī fī al-Balāgha: Al-Bayān, wa al-Badiʿ wa al-Maʿānī (Cairo: Dār al-Tawfīqiyya lil-Turāth, 2011), 374.
    2. Basil Hatim, Arabic Rhetoric: The Pragmatics of Deviation from Linguistic Norms, LINCOM Studies in Communication 04 (Munich: Lincom Europa, 2010), 136-146, ISBN 9783929075731.
    3. Hussein Abdul-Raof, Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis (Oxford: Routledge, 2006), 108-114, ISBN 9780415386098. DOI: 10.4324/9780203965399
    4. Ayman Amin Abd Al-Ghani, Al-Kāfī fī al-Balāgha: Al-Bayān, wa al-Badiʿ wa al-Maʿānī (Cairo: Dār al-Tawfīqiyya lil-Turāth, 2011), 401-407.



    Page history

    You are viewing the live version of this page. Would you like to view the version included in the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy (v0.1.1)?