REFSHFT: Referential Shift

    From The Encyclopedia of Arabic Rhetoric

    الاستخدام
    REFSHFT: Referential Shift
    CategoryLinguistic Embellishments
    (‘ilm al-badī‘)
    SubcategoryIndirectness & Ambiguity
      
    BALAGHAScore.com
    CodeCA-12
      
    BalaghaBase.org
    CodeQ80
      
    OpenAlex.org
    IDW4415372090
      
    Cite this page
    🔗 DOI10.64393/balagha.Q80
     Download PDF
      
    Taxonomy
    ARDTv0.1.0, v0.1.1

    Definition

    Referential Shift (al-istikhdām) is an Arabic rhetorical device involving the use of a word shared between two meanings (lafẓ mushtarak) with one of its meanings intended, after which a pronoun referring back to it carries the other meaning; or alternatively, two pronouns referring back to it are used, the second carrying a different meaning from the first.[1][2]

    Heinrichs (1998) describes this as "employing (both meanings of a homonym)", either by using the word in one meaning and referring back to the other meaning with a pronoun, or by using the word with both meanings such that it must be repeated in translation.[3]. Heinrichs (1998) notes that this second sense is not found in al-Qazwīnī.[3]

    Mechanism

    • A word shared between two meanings (lafẓ mushtarak) is introduced with one of its meanings intended.[1][2]
    • A pronoun (ḍamīr) subsequently refers back to that word while carrying its other meaning — not the meaning originally intended.[1][2]
    • Alternatively, two pronouns refer back to the word: the first carrying one meaning, the second carrying a different meaning from the first.[1][2]

    Recognition

    The following diagnostic tests aid identification:

    • Test 1: Identify the antecedent word and its intended meaning at first use. Then locate any pronoun referring back to it and ask: does the pronoun carry the same meaning, or a different one? If different, al-istikhdām may be present.
    • Test 2: Where two pronouns refer to the same antecedent, check whether they carry the same or different meanings. If the second pronoun carries a meaning distinct from the first, this is the second subtype.

    Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects

    • Retrospective semantic reactivation: The shared lexical form is initially anchored in one meaning, but the later pronoun reactivates an alternative meaning latent within it. This causes the audience to revise their understanding retrospectively, producing a layered semantic effect within a single utterance.
    • Concealed semantic transition: The anaphoric function of pronouns creates an expectation of referential continuity, and it is this expectation that the device exploits. The shift in meaning is absorbed seamlessly rather than signalled explicitly, giving the utterance a sense of smoothness and concealed craftsmanship.
    • Semantic economy: The device allows two meanings or referential frames to be carried by a single lexical form without repeating the word itself. This creates expressive density and permits semantic expansion without lexical expansion.
    • Sustained semantic tension: In the second subtype, where two pronouns activate different meanings of the same antecedent, both meanings are held in interpretive tension across a single utterance. This creates a sustained interplay between the referential possibilities of the original word.
    • Audience participation through lexical recognition: The effect depends on the audience recognising the semantic range of the shared lexical form and tracking the shift in reference. Successful recognition produces a sense of interpretive participation and rhetorical reward.

    Applying the Recognition Framework

    The information on this page can be used to evaluate whether this device is present in a candidate lexical item using the Specific Device Recognition part of the Universal Framework for Identifying Arabic Rhetorical Devices:

    • Use the Definition, Mechanism, and Recognition sections of this page in Step 1.
    • Apply the substitution test in Step 2.
    • Consider contextual indicators in Step 3.
    • Use the Diagnostic Rhetorical Effects section of this page in Step 4.

    Types of Referential Shift

    Nāṣif et al. (2012) and al-Hāshimī (2019) identify two types:[1][2]

    Type 1: Single pronoun carrying the alternative meaning

    The shared lexical form is used with one meaning, and a single pronoun referring back to it carries the other meaning.[1][2]
    Source Example

    فَمَن شَهِدَ مِنكُمُ ٱلشَّهْرَ فَلْيَصُمْهُ

    Quran 2:185 — So whoever is present this month, let them fast it.

    Explanation
    al-shahr (the month) is first used to mean the crescent moon (al-hilāl). The pronoun hu (it) then refers back to al-shahr, but carries a different meaning: Nāṣif et al. (2012) gloss this as "the known time/period" (al-zamān al-maʿlūm),[1] while al-Hāshimī (2019) glosses it as "the days of Ramadan".[2]
    Source Example

    إِذَا نَزَلَ السَّمَاءُ بِأَرْضِ قَوْمٍ رَعَيْنَاهُ وَإِنْ كَانُوا غِضَابَا

    Muʿāwiya ibn Mālik — When the sky descends upon the land of a people, we graze it even if they are angered.

    Explanation
    al-samāʾ is used first to mean rain. The pronoun in raʿaynāhu (we graze it) refers back to al-samāʾ with the meaning of vegetation.[2]
    Constructed Example

    زُرْتُ العَيْنَ القَرِيبَةَ مِنَ القَرْيَةِ وَشَرِبْتُ مِنْهَا

    I visited the spring near the village and drank from it.

    Explanation
    al-ʿayn is first used to mean the eye (its primary sense in the construction al-ʿayn al-qarība evoking a watchful or familiar presence). The pronoun in min-hā (from it) refers back to al-ʿayn with the meaning of a water spring.

    Type 2: Two pronouns, the second carrying a different meaning from the first

    Two pronouns refer back to the same shared lexical form; the second pronoun carries a different meaning from that intended by the first.[1][2]
    Source Example

    فَسَقَى الغَضَا وَالسَّاكِنِيهِ وَإِنْ هُمُ شَبُّوهُ بَيْنَ جَوَانِحِي وَضُلُوعِي

    al-Buḥturī — May [the rain] drench the euphorbia grove and its inhabitants, even though they kindle it [i.e. the fire of euphorbia wood] between my front and rear ribs.

    Explanation
    al-ghaḍā is a tree of the desert. The first pronoun in sākini-hi (its inhabitants) refers back to al-ghaḍā with the meaning of place (i.e. the grove as a location). The second pronoun in shabbū-hu (they kindle it) refers back to al-ghaḍā with the meaning of the fire produced from euphorbia wood.[1][2]
    Constructed Example

    أَحْبَبْتُ اللِّسَانَ العَرَبِيَّ وَأَتْقَنْتُ قَوَاعِدَهُ حَتَّى صَارَ هُ سِلَاحِي فِي كُلِّ خِطَابٍ

    I loved the Arabic tongue and mastered its rules, until it became my weapon in every address.

    Explanation
    al-lisān bears two meanings: the tongue (the organ) and language/speech. The first pronoun in qawāʿidi-hi (its rules) refers back to al-lisān with the meaning of language. The second pronoun in ṣāra-hu (it became) refers back to al-lisān with the meaning of the physical tongue as an instrument.

    Notes

    • The gloss of the pronoun referent in the Quranic example (Quran 2:185) differs between sources: Nāṣif et al. (2012) use "الزمان المعلوم" (the known time/period); al-Hāshimī (2019) use "أيام رمضان" (the days of Ramadan).
    • The assignment of the al-Buḥturī verse differs between sources: Heinrichs (1998) classifies it under his first kind, whereas Nāṣif et al. (2012) and al-Hāshimī (2019) classify it under the second subtype.
    • Heinrichs (1998) explicitly states that the second sense of the device (using the word with both meanings) "is not in al-Qazwīnī." This source-critical remark is retained as a note rather than incorporated into the definition.
    • The term lafẓ mushtarak is translated here as "shared lexical form" to reflect the Arabic grammatical concept of a single phonological form bearing multiple distinct meanings.
    • Heinrichs (1998) gives an additional example from Abū Tammām (وسواس), illustrating his broader second sense of the device in which the word operates with both meanings such that it must be repeated in translation.[3] This broader sense is not present in Nāṣif et al. (2012) or al-Hāshimī (2019).

    References

    1. a b c d e f g h i Ḥafnī Nāṣif, Muḥammad Diyāb, Sultan Muḥammad and Muṣṭafā Ṭammām, Durūs al-Balāgha (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2012), 108–109, ISBN 9786144162798. [1]
    2. a b c d e f g h i j Aḥmad al-Hāshimī, Jawāhir al-Balāgha fī al-Maʿānī wa-al-Bayān wa-al-Badīʿ (Windsor: Hindāwī Foundation, 2019), 364, ISBN 9781527316386. [2]
    3. a b c W. P. Heinrichs, ‘Rhetorical Figures’, in Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, ed. Julie Scott Meisami and Paul Starkey (London: Routledge, 1998), 657, ISBN 0415068088. DOI: 10.4324/9780203020425



    Page history

    You are viewing the live version of this page. Would you like to view the version included in the Arabic Rhetorical Device Taxonomy (v0.1.1)?